郑樵、朱熹《诗》学传承关系考论  

A Textual Study of ZHENG Qiao and ZHU Xi's Inheriting Relationship in the Study on The Book of Poetry

作　　者：汪祚民[1] 

机构地区：[1]安庆师范学院学报编辑部,安徽安庆246133

出　　处：《安庆师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2011年第12期1-7,共7页Journal of Anqing Teachers College(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金(09BZW015);安徽省哲学社科规划项目(AHSK05-06D64)

摘　　要：在《诗经》阐释史上,对毛诗序传进行系统全面清理与批驳的,首倡者郑樵,响应者朱熹;弃《序》说《诗》,以己意为之序,在解《诗》实践中最大限度地消除毛诗序传的影响的首推郑樵,继以朱熹;对《诗经》作声歌还原说解和将郑卫之诗多视为男女淫诗的同样是郑樵前呼,朱熹后应;郑樵作《诗传》《诗辨妄》,朱熹作《诗集传》《诗序辨说》。郑樵《诗》学的创新观点经朱子发扬光大,开拓了《诗经》宋学的崭新疆域。In the history of the interpretation of The Book of Poetry,ZHENG Qiao first systematically put Mao＇s Prefaced Version of it in order and voiced different opinions,and ZHU Xi followed suit.By referring to The Book of Poetry as Poetry instead of Preface,in the practice of the interpretation of The Book of Poetry,ZHENG Qiao was also the first who diminished the influence of Mao＇s Prefaced Version at its maximum,and ZHU Xi followed.It was still ZHENG Qiao who interpreted The Book of Poetry as songs and regarded ZHENG and WEI Poetry as obscene poems on men and women,and ZHU Xi responded later.ZHENG Qiao composed Biography of Poetry,Absurd Defence of Poetry and ZHU Xi composed Biography of Poetry Anthology and Defence of Poetry Preface.ZHENG Qiao＇s creative views of the study on The Book of Poetry were carried forward by ZHU Xi,which opened up a new research field on The Book of Poetry in Song Dynasty.

关 键 词：郑樵 朱熹 《诗经》宋学 

分 类 号：I222.2[文学—中国文学]