检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶思蓉[1]
出 处:《安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2011年第12期59-63,共5页Journal of Anqing Teachers College(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:我国行政诉讼案件申请上级行政机关裁决,法律可操作性不强,不利于保护行政相对人的利益,效率低下。美国、英国、日本通过司法的途径解决行政权限争议。构建我国机关诉讼制度,要明确原告的主体资格,严格限定受案范围,确立中级以上人民法院管辖审理方式,以书面审查为原则,判决类型以确认判决为主。In China,administrative lawsuits are applied for higher administrative authorities' adjudication,which is not operative in judicial processes,and not conducive to protect the interests of administrative counterpart,and is thus inefficient.In the United States,the United Kingdom and Japan,administrative lawsuits are exercised in the judicatory way.To construct litigation of public authorities in our country,it is necessary to made clear the subject qualification of the plaintiff,strictly limit the acceptance scopes,establish the methods of jurisdiction trial in the intermediate people's courts and above: hearing the case by the written reviewing,and giving declaratory judgments as the major form of court decision.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3