论生存机会丧失救济理论的法律适用路径  

On the Legal Application Means of Relief Theory of Survival Chance Lose

作　　者：曾瑞声[1] 

机构地区：[1]暨南大学法学院

出　　处：《医学与法学》2011年第4期1-5,24,共6页Medicine and Jurisprudence

摘　　要：医疗侵权领域中因医生的过失导致患者生存机会的丧失属于患者的类权利受到侵害，这在我国的司法实践中很少能够得到救济。解决该问题的路径有二：将生存机会丧失纳入侵权损害的范畴予以保护；或改变传统因果关系认定规则，建立新型的因果关系模型以对生存机会丧失予以救济。比较之，以扩大损害内涵的路径来适用生存机会丧失救济理论在我国的社会接受程度较高，同时对法律的稳定性影响较少。生存机会丧失救济理论在我国的适用可能会带来司法成本过高、防卫性医疗和社会保险增加、法律的确定性和稳定性受到影响等问题。因此在适用该理论时需注意：在适用范围上予以限制；明确生存机会丧失的认定方法以及损害赔偿项目应该多元化。In medical tort cases, if patients＂ survival chances lost because of doctors＂ malpractice, few of them can get relief in China. There are two ways to solve the problem： classify the chances of survival in the cate- gory of the loss of tort and protect them; or change the traditional causation rules, build a new model of causal re- lationship to relive survival chances loss. Comparatively speaking, it is commonly accepted by people in our coun- try to apply the relief theory by expanding damage connotation, which affect little of the stability of laws. But there may be some problems in the implication of relief theory in China, such as high judicial cost, increase in defensive medical treatment and social insurance, and irKluence on the certainty and stability of laws, etc.. There- fore, in its application, we should restrict the application scope, clear the affirming methods of survival chance loss and diversify damage compensation programs.

关 键 词：生存机会丧失救济理论 法律适用 路径比较 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]