兴奋剂案件中的间接证据问题  

Circumstantial Evidence in Doping Case

作　　者：宋彬龄[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《天津体育学院学报》2011年第5期379-383,共5页Journal of Tianjin University of Sport

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(项目编号:06BTY013)

摘　　要：目前的兴奋剂案件中,间接证据的价值被低估或完全否定。过度依赖直接证据的趋势有着不利于兴奋剂违纪的惩处、使裁决的公正性被质疑、给案件侦查以不良导向等不良影响。错案数据分析指出,间接证据通常比直接证据更可靠,应充分发挥间接证据的印证功能、补证功能以及独立定案功能。在近年来的兴奋剂案件中,也有一些完全用间接证据证明兴奋剂违纪的先例,运用身体参数变动推定法、排除法、整体合力推导法3种方法。建议在今后的兴奋剂案件中增强间接证据的印证功能和补证功能、加强间接证据单独定案功能的运用、重视间接证据证明结构的法律化。在我国应加快体育仲裁程序的设立、注重对证据补强规则的应用、正确认识兴奋剂案件的证明标准。In the doping case at present,the circumstantial evidence is undervaluing or denied completely.Over-depending on the direct evidence is going against to the prosecuting of the doping defense and influences the equity of the verdict,even gives bad influence to the inquiry of the doping case.Error rates statistics support that the circumstantial evidence is more reliable than the direct evidence.It should fully use the function of testifying and complement of the circumstantial evidence and use it to make verdict choices independently.In the doping case of recent years,there were some precedents using the circumstantial evidence independently to prove doping defense which use the methods of athletic profiling,excluding and inferring in whole.It suggested reinforce the function of testifying and complement of the circumstantial evidence and enhance the utilizing of the circumstantial evidence to make verdict choices independently and pay more attention to legislating the proving structure.It should accelerate to construct the sport arbitration,apply to the confession corroboration rule and make correct recognizing of the proof standard in the doping case in China.

关 键 词：兴奋剂案件 间接证据 证明结构 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]