中美未决羁押审查程序比较研究  

Comparative Study on Review Procedures of Custody Pending between China and America

作　　者：叶雨晴[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院,安徽合肥230601

出　　处：《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2012年第1期27-29,共3页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators

摘　　要：我国未决羁押采取行政化的审查方式加之缺乏其他的配套制度,导致司法实践中侵犯犯罪嫌疑人、被告人合法权利的现象时有发生。完善我国未决羁押审查程序,应首先将羁押同拘留、逮捕分离,引入羁押听证程序,并赋予犯罪嫌疑人、被告人不服听证结果的上诉权、申诉权和定期申请审查权。Custody pending of our country takes the way of administrative review and lacks of other supporting systems,so the legal rights of criminal suspects and defendants are often violated in judicial practice.In order to improve the review procedures of custody pending of our country,we should firstly separate custody from detention and arrest,and then introduce custody hearing procedures.We also should give the right of appeal,the right to appeal and the right to apply for review on a regular basis for the criminal suspects and defendants if they refuse to accept the result of hearing.

关 键 词：未决羁押 审查程序 逮捕前置 羁押听证 司法救济 

分 类 号：D924.11[政治法律—刑法学]