检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工业大学市政环境工程学院,城市水资源与水环境国家重点实验室,黑龙江哈尔滨150090
出 处:《中国环境科学》2012年第2期359-365,共7页China Environmental Science
基 金:国家科技重大专项(2009Z07631-002,2009ZX07526-006);国家环保“十二五”规划前期研究课题;城市水资源与水环境国家重点实验室(哈尔滨工业大学)资助课题(2010DX08,2010 DX09)
摘 要:为建立和量化适于河流型饮用水水源地选址的评价体系,以北方某城市A的水源地选址方案为研究对象,通过层次分析法(AHP)从法律制约、环境质量、水资源保障和环境风险角度构建评价体系.评价体系共设立8个否定因子和20个评价因子,采用文献分析和专家问卷调查相结合的方法确定评价因子权重,并依据环境标准和技术导则确定评分标准,可对多个选址方案进行评价与优选.研究表明,城市A的选址方案Ⅰ与方案Ⅱ均可做为水源地选址方案进行工程论证;城市A所处流域综合水质状况不佳,在后续的给水厂建设中应考虑采用深度处理工艺;城市A的选址方案Ⅰ与方案Ⅱ的环境风险系数均较高,管理部门应依据选址方案的风险特征加强上游风险源管理.In order to establish and quantize the assessment system for the site selection of river drinking source water,City A in northern was took as the case.The assessment system which involve law,environmental quality,water resources protection and environmental risk was established by analytic hierarchy process(AHP).There were eight negative factors and twenty evaluation factors in the system,and the weight of evaluation factors were defined by literature review and expert survey.These evaluation factors were quantized according to environmental standards and technical guidelines.Both programⅠandⅡof City A can be carried engineering appraisal out;the water quality of river basin was no good,so the advanced treatment process should be considered in the construction of water plant;the environmental risk index of programⅠ andⅡwere high,administration should strengthen the management of risk source on the risk characteristics.
分 类 号:X321[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229