检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]银川市妇幼保健院,750001
出 处:《中国实用妇科与产科杂志》2000年第2期86-88,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics
摘 要:目的 探讨两种分娩镇痛方法的效果。方法 采用蛛网膜下腔及硬膜外腔联合给予低质量浓度麻醉药及镇痛药 (联合法 )和单纯硬膜外腔阻滞的方法 (单纯法 )分别对 30例初产妇进行分娩镇痛 ,比较两组的镇痛效果、不良反应及对产程、分娩方式、产后出血量、胎儿及新生儿等的影响 ,并与 5 0例正常未干预组产妇比较。结果 联合组效果较好 ,单纯组镇痛作用欠佳且增加阴道分娩的助产率。结论 联合法分娩镇痛比单纯法效果好 ,副反应少 ,对母婴无明显不良影响 。Objective\ To study the efficacy of two painless birth methods.Methods\ We adopted two methods that narcotics and analgesics were injected into subarachnoid space and epidural space(combined method)or single epidural block anesthesia(single method)to study the analgesia birth for 30 nullipara women respectively.Their results were taken a comparative study,including the analgesia efficacy,side effect,birth time and mode,postpartum haemorrhage and the condition of the newborn.And then take the comparative study with the control group that was not given analgesia.Results\ The efficacy of combined method was better than the single method.The latter increased the aid-vaginal birth rate.Conclusion\ The combined method has great value.It has better efficacy and less side effects.It was very safe to both mothers and newborns.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28