检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴建春[1]
机构地区:[1]江门职业技术学院思想政治教学部,广东江门529000
出 处:《石家庄经济学院学报》2011年第6期120-123,共4页Journal of Shijiazhuang University of Economics
摘 要:孙中山主张的"平均地权"思想,内涵复杂,由于土地公有或均等分配无法实现,只好将其解释为:核定地价,土地增值归公,甚至设想按照土地核定价由国家收购后,再分给无地农民等。虽然从总体上看,仅是一种对封建土地状况进行改良的做法,不能够完全代表、体现、满足当时广大农民对土地的需求或愿望,而且由于孙中山去世过早也没有能够得到落实。但是,孙中山关于"平均地权"的丰富思想,对于目前如何处理诸如土地收益和增值等问题,具有一定的参考借鉴意义。Sun Yat-Sen's claim of "equalization" encompasses complicated connotation.Due to the public ownership and equal allocation was impossible in that time,so we have to interpret it as approved land prices and turning the value-added land to the collective.Even we can envisage that the land was allocated to the farmers who were no land after the land was acquired by national government in accordance with the approved price.However,it is only a feudal improved land status practice and cannot fully represent,reflect and meet the needs or aspirations of the broad masses of peasants at that time.Since the death of Sun Yat-sen,it was unable to be implemented.However,the profound connotation of Sun Yat-Sen's "equalization" can be taken as a reference in dealing with land revenue and value-added lande.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3