学术博客与传统学术期刊的竞合发展  

Competition and cooperation between academic blogs and traditional academic journals

作　　者：陈鹏[1] 张美琼[1,2] 黄历[1] 卢怡[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]中国水产学会<水产学报>编辑部,上海201306 [2]<上海海洋大学学报>编辑部,上海201306

出　　处：《编辑学报》2012年第1期19-22,共4页Acta Editologica

基　　金：中国科协精品期刊工程资助项目(QK2010001-B)

摘　　要：传统学术期刊是人们进行知识交流与信息发布的重要媒体,而随着网络技术的发展,学术博客已经成为一种重要的网络交流和个人出版工具。同样作为学术交流的平台,两者在作者群体、受众群体以及刊载内容上因具有一定的同源性,竞争将不可避免。同时,两者又各有优势和局限:学术博客在互动性、主动性、丰富性、及时性上表现出优势,但在内容的真实性、受众的认可度及阅读的深度上不及传统学术期刊。因此,两者相互融合,学术博客将可以为传统学术期刊的发展提供新契机,传统学术期刊则可以为学术博客的繁荣创造条件。Traditional academic journals are the major media for people to exchange knowledge and information. With the development of network technologies, academic blogs have become an important tool for network communication and personal publications, and have been widely accepted by more and more people. Both as platforms for academic exchange, journals and blogs share same authorships, readerships and contents; therefore, the competition between the two groups is predictable. At the same time, they have their own advantages and limitations. Interaction, initiative, diversity and timeliness are superiorities of blogs over traditional academic journals, while the authenticity of the contents, accreditation and the depth reading are the weakness of blogs. Therefore, an integration of academic blogs with traditional academic journals could be the future development trend.

关 键 词：学术博客 学术期刊 竞合发展 学术交流 

分 类 号：G206[文化科学—传播学] G237.5