检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶伟红[1] 刘丙进[2] 华俊彦[1] 田伟强[1]
机构地区:[1]丽水市中心医院药剂科,浙江丽水323000 [2]丽水学院药理教研室,浙江丽水323000
出 处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2012年第4期797-799,共3页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
摘 要:目的探讨干预前后外科围术期预防用抗菌药物的合理性与干预措施实施的效果。方法抽取实施干预前(2009年7-12月)及干预后(2010年7-12月)外科手术出院病历共600份(每月50份),进行干预前后预防用抗菌药物合理性的对照研究。结果干预后抗菌药物预防使用率显著下降,由干预前99.67%下降为干预后62.67%(P<0.05);抗菌药物的合理使用率显著提高,由干预前8.66%上升为干预后51.00%(P<0.05);不合理使用抗菌药物的现象明显改善。结论医院采取的干预措施有效、可行,可显著提高抗菌药物的合理使用率,从而达到提高医疗质量,降低资源浪费的目的。OBJECTIVE To explore the rational use of antibiotics during perioperative period before and after intervention and the effects of clinical pharmacist intervention.METHODS A total of 600 discharge medical records of two patient groups were randomly selected and compared,including the pre-intervention group from Jul.to Dec.2009 and post-intervention group from Jul.to Dec.2010.RESULTS Control study was performed for rational use of prophylactic antibiotics before and after intervention.After intervention,prophylactic use of antibiotics significantly decreased from 99.67% to 62.67%,(P〈0.05).There was a significant improvement on the rationality of antibiotic use(8.66% vs 51.00% P 0.05).The phenomenon of the irrational antibiotic use was significantly improved.CONCLUSION The intervention measures are effective and practicable.This principle can contribute to the rational use of antibiotics,so as to improve the quality of medical treatment,and reduce the waste of resources.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229