周礼王城:天下一家的空间图式  

Zhou King City——The Spatial Pattern of the “ One World of All”

作　　者：张腾辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学历史学系,上海200433

出　　处：《学术月刊》2012年第2期115-125,共11页Academic Monthly

摘　　要：《周礼.冬官.考工》中所记载的"营国制度"是关于中国古代都城形制的重要文献。长期以来,学术界将"营国制度"文献中的"面朝背市"理解为建筑方位上的"南朝北市",这就和中国古代都城"北朝南市"的实际空间格局相背离。将"营国制度"文献原文及其注释还原到其应有的历史原境以后,发现"营国制度"原文及其注释经历了一个从人(君臣)到物(建筑)的演化过程。这一过程又与中国中古时期"天下一家"政治理念的生成与发展相契合。"营国制度"也由此成为"天下一家"意象空间创设的指导性文本与理想图式。基于"天下一家"理念及其空间图式,"营国制度"文献本身的意义不但获得更加深入的剖析,同时营国制度空间图式与现实都城空间形制之间的矛盾也得以解决。The＂capital planning system ＂in ＂Zhou Li Dong Gong ~ Kao Gong＂（《周礼·冬宫·考工》） is an important document about the space patterns of ancient Chinese capital. For a long time, scholars regard ＂facing the imperial court and back to the market＂ as ＂imperial court in the south and market in the north＂, and deviates from the actual spatial pattern of the ancient Chinese capitals. Once put the ＂capital planning system＂ into the history context, we will find the original documents and notes has gone through an evolution process from the monarch and official to buildings. This process also accompanied with the generation and development of Chinese Middle Ages political idea ＂one world of all＂. The ＂capital planning system＂ has thus become the ideal pattern and the guiding text of image space of ＂one world of all＂. Based on the＂one world of all＂ concept and its spatial pattern, not only can the meaning of capital planning system be analyzed more in-depth, but also the contradiction between ideal pattern and actual ancient capital space can be overcome.

关 键 词：营国制度 周礼王城 君臣空间 天下一家 

分 类 号：K224[历史地理—历史学]