论应当赋予侵权债权在破产分配中以优先地位  

Tort Claims Should Be Given Priority in the Order of Distribution in Bankruptcy

作　　者：马东[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆400031

出　　处：《法学杂志》2012年第2期137-141,共5页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：2009年教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目"民事执行检察监督研究"(09YJA820043)阶段性成果

摘　　要："三鹿"奶粉事件凸显在企业大规模侵权下在破产程序中赋予侵权债权普通债权人的地位具有不合理性。赋予侵权之债债权以普通债权的地位是对私法概念的曲解,违背了民商法公平正义的价值理念,不符合商法追求社会效益的价值诉求。基于此,应当赋予侵权之债在破产分配中以优先地位。Sanlu milk power scandal makes it clear that it is unreasonable to give mass tort claims ordinary status in the bankruptcy proceedings. To give tort claims ordinary status is a misunderstanding of the concept of private law and a violation of justice and social efficiency values of civil and commercial law. To this end, tort claims should be given priority in the order of distribution in bankruptcy.

关 键 词：概念的体系性 公平性 效益性 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]