检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘玉飞[1]
机构地区:[1]3M中国有限公司,广州510663
出 处:《中国个体防护装备》2012年第1期32-36,共5页China Personal Protective Equipment
摘 要:关于护听器声衰减能力的评价,目前有好几种方法都有大量文献充分地论证。本文介绍了3种标准化的评价方法:真耳听阈衰减法(Real-ear attenuation at threshold,REAT),真耳内置麦克风(Microphone in real ear,MIRE),和声学仿真测量装置(Acoustical test fixture,ATF)方法。讨论了评价护听器声衰减能力,这3种方法各自的优缺点和适用范围。REAT方法是评价护听器声衰减值最准确的方法之一,目前被国际标准普遍采用。There are a number of well documented test methods to measure the noise attenuation values of hearing protection devices (HPD) . In this paper, three standardized test methods--Real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT) , Microphone in real ear (MIRE) , and Acoustical test fixture (ATF) were briefly introduced. The advantage and disadvantage of these three test methods on being used in hearing protector attenuation measurement were discussed in this paper. REAT method has been shown to be the most accurate method at estimate the performance of hearing protectors, and has been thoroughly standardized around the world.
关 键 词:护听器 声衰减值 真耳听阈衰减法 真耳内置麦克风 声学仿真测量装置 个人声衰减值
分 类 号:TH785.1[机械工程—仪器科学与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28