检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长江科学院岩土力学与工程重点实验室,武汉430010
出 处:《长江科学院院报》2012年第2期51-54,共4页Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute
摘 要:混流式水轮机发电机组钢衬蜗壳有不同埋设方式,三峡水轮发电机组钢衬蜗壳是目前世界上混流式水轮机最大的蜗壳,左岸电站全部为保压方案。针对右岸水电站厂房钢衬蜗壳2种埋设方案,建立三维有限元模型,研究蜗壳保压方案和垫层方案的固有振动特性和地震响应,采用振型叠加反应谱法计算地震动力响应,分析不同蜗壳埋设方案对结构的自振特性及地震响应的影响。分析结果表明:就抗地震作用而言,2种方案都是可取的,垫层方案略优于保压方案。There are various embedment options for the steel-lined spiral case of Francis turbine unit. Only constant-pressure option was adopted in the steel-lined spiral case in the left bank hydropower plant of Three Gorges Project. To study the earthquake resistance of two embedment options for spiral case in the right bank hydropower plant, this paper presents a 3D finite element model to study the natural frequencies and seismic responses of steel- lined spiral case embedded under constant-pressure and embedded with supporting lining layer. Dynamic response of earthquake is calculated by the superposition of vibration modes. The analysis results indicate that different embedment options have little impact on structural natural frequency and seismic response. Both embedment options are feasible in earthquake resistance design, with the latter slightly better than the former.
分 类 号:TV312[水利工程—水工结构工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229