词体革命:创作思路与理论建构  

"Ci Poetry Revolution" in the Early 20th Century:Theory and Practice

作　　者：倪春军[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学中文系,上海200433

出　　处：《兰州大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第1期31-40,共10页Journal of Lanzhou University（Social Sciences）

摘　　要：以梁启超等人为代表的"诗界革命"的发起者和参与者,没有进行词体革命,这不仅表现为创作的贫乏,更表现为理论的缺失。而梁启超前期以"雅化"的标准推尊词体,也许是他没有进行词体革命的内在因素。胡适提出"白话词"理论,应该为现代文学史上词体的第一次革命,但还只是文学革命的附庸。曾今可发起的"词的解放"运动,是"诗界革命"以来第一次以词为主体的革命,取得了理论和实践的双重丰收;但因为未能领会诗界革命"新意境"的内涵,从而脱离了时代。李冰若和卢冀野之"旧辞新境"的改革,取得了理论和创作的成功,是最接近梁启超"诗界革命"精神的一次词体革命。词体革命经历了四个阶段,经过了三代学人的传递,呈现出不同的词体定位意识,导致各家理论无法调和,很难创造出各种要素完美结合的新词体。但词体革命在语言、格律、意境、风格等方面的探索,对当代词坛具有重要的启示。The Poetry Revolution Movement led by Liang Qichao excluded ci from their endeavour,and Hu Shi＇s ＂vernacular ci＂ theory,the first time a change in ci was advocated,was but a by-product of his literary reform movement.The ＂ci liberation movement＂ led by Zeng Jinke was the first effort made in the theory and pratice of ci poetry,which,in spite of its achievements,was alienated from the contemporary literary climate.Li Bingruo and Lu Jiye advocated a ＂new wine in the old bottle＂ thoery for ci reform and came close to the spirit of Liang＇s Poetry Revolution Movement.Various theories by these scholars did not reach a consensus,and therefore did not create an ideal form for the ci poem,but their efforts helped bring about reflections on the language,metrical regulations, connotations and styles of this special verse form.

关 键 词：词体革命 词体缺席 白话词 词的解放 旧辞新境 

分 类 号：I207.23[文学—中国文学]