检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张绍英[1]
出 处:《中国卫生产业》2012年第1期32-33,共2页China Health Industry
摘 要:目的探讨中西医结合治疗原发性肾病综合征的临床疗效和安全性。方法 84例原发性肾病综合征患者采用随机数字表的方法,分为观察组43例和对照组41例,对照组给予纯西药治疗,观察组加用中药治疗,观察比较2组患者的临床治疗效果。结果观察组总有效率86.05%,明显高于对照组的58.54%;观察组复发率为4.65%,不良反应发生率为20.93%,明显低于对照组的56.10%、24.39%;差异均存在统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患者的生化指标均改善,但是观察组改善更明显(P<0.05)。结论中西医结合治疗原发性肾病综合征具有临床效果好、缓解率高、副作用低等优点,值得临床推广应用。Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and safe of Chinese traditional medicine combined with the western medicine treatment patients with primary nephrotic syndrome.Methods 84 cases patients with primary nephrotic syndrome were divided randomly into the intervention group(43 cases) and the control group(41 cases);the patients in intervention group were treated with Chinese traditional medicine combined with the western medicine,the control group was treated with pure western medicine,Two groups of clinical efficacy were observed and compared.Results The total effective rate in intervention group was 86.05%,higher than the 58.54% in control group;Recurrence rate was 4.65%,adverse reactions rate was 20.93% in intervention group,that lower than respectively 56.10%,24.39% in control group,there were significant differences(P0.05).Two groups of biochemical indexes were improved,but the intervention group improved more significantly(P0.05).Conclusion Chinese traditional medicine combined with the western medicine treatment patients with primary nephrotic syndrome is obviously effective and safe,has high relieving rate and little side effects,and hence is worthy of being recommended in clinical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28