无张力疝修补术与传统修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究  

The Control Study of Traditional Hernioplasty and Plug Mesh Hernia Repair in the Treatment of Inguinal Hernia Treatment Cholelithiasis

作　　者：肖光云[1] 

机构地区：[1]都江堰市人民医院普外科,四川都江堰611830

出　　处：《中国卫生产业》2012年第1期34-35,共2页China Health Industry

摘　　要：目的比较无张力疝修补术与传统修补术治疗腹股沟疝治疗腹股沟疝的优缺点,为腹股沟疝患者寻求更为理想的治疗方法。方法腹股沟疝患者100例,分为2组:无张力疝修补术组50例作为观察组,传统修补术组50例作为对照组,观察2组患者手术时间、下床活动时间、住院时间、术后疼痛情况、术处牵拉感以及术后并发症等。结果观察组手术时间、下床活动时间、住院时间、术后疼痛情况、术处牵拉感以及术后并发症均比对照组少,差异学有统计意义(P<0.05)。结论无张力疝修补术具有手术时间短,对患者痛苦小,术后恢复快并且术后并发症少等优点,值得临床广泛推广。Objective To compare the traditional hernioplasty and plug mesh hernia repair in the clinical treatment of inguinal hernia,the better therapies maybe discovered.Methods One hundred cases of inguinal hernia hospitalized were randomly selected and divided into two groups.The patient of control group（50cases） were applied traditional hernioplasty,and the patient of the treatment group（50cases） treated by plug mesh hernia repair.The operative time,hospitalization time,postoperative pain and tractate,postoperative complications were compared between two groups.Results There were significant differences（P0.05）in operative time,hospitalization time,postoperative pain and tractate,postoperative complications and recurrence rate between two groups.Conclusion The plug mesh hernia repair is a good choice for inguinal hernia surgery because of the short hospital stay,rapid recovery,no wound infection,and low recurrence rate.

关 键 词：腹股沟疝 无张力疝修补术 传统疝修补术 

分 类 号：R656.2[医药卫生—外科学]