从批评性体裁分析的角度看学术论文摘要和引言的体裁关系  

A Critical Genre Analysis of Generic Relation Between Abstracts and Introductions of Academic Articles

作　　者：韩萍[1] 贺宏[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学外国语学院,重庆400044

出　　处：《外语与外语教学》2012年第1期53-57,共5页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

基　　金：重庆市哲学社会科学基金项目"学术语类英汉双语语料库的建立与对比研究"(项目编号:2007-YY10)资金资助

摘　　要：本文运用Bhatia(2008)的批评性体裁分析方法,分析了应用语言学学科的两个分支学科(二语习得研究和二语写作研究)学术论文摘要和引言的体裁关系,旨在揭示学术语篇中学科之间和体裁之间的复杂关系。研究表明:二语写作的学术论文摘要和引言在功能和结构上比二语习得的摘要和引言更具相似性,"声明重要性"和"指出差距"两个语步在其学术文章的摘要和引言中具有同样重要的地位;在二语习得论文中,摘要和引言的结构存在较大差异,"声明重要性"和"文献综述"是学术文章引言的重要语步,但很少出现在其摘要中。本文认为,要理解不同学科中的学术写作,不应只研究某种体裁在该学科中的变化形式,还应探索多种相关体裁之间的关系,而且还应关注各种文本外部因素对体裁构建的影响。Based on the method of critical genre analysis put forward by Bbatia （2008）, this paper reports an investigation of the generic relationships of research article （RA） abstracts and introductions in two sub-disciplines （second language acquisition （SLA） research and second language writing （SLW） research） of applied linguistics ,aiming to reveal the complexities between different disciplines and genres in academic discourse. Findings indicate that RA abstracts and introductions in SLW bear a greater similarity in function and organization than the same two genres in SLA. Both ＂Centrality Claim＂ and ＂Indicating a Gap＂ have a fairly important presence in RA introductions and abstracts of SLW. However, this is not the case in SLA, where ＂Centrality Claim＂ and ＂Literature Review＂ are quite important in introductions, while in abstracts they are largely absent. It is suggested that in order to understand academic writing in different disciplines, we should not only analyse the variations of a certain genre in disciplines concerned, but also explore relationships among related genres. More attention should also be given to text-external factors that influence the construction of genres.

关 键 词：批评性体裁分析 摘要 引言 体裁关系 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]