检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京政治学院政治理论二系,江苏南京210003
出 处:《南京政治学院学报》2012年第1期63-68,共6页Journal of PLA Nanjing Institute of Politics
摘 要:区别于传统社会法律强制力,当代法治社会法律强制力的"当代"之含义,从其走向看,已从传统"压制或强迫的力量"发展到"内在或自制的力量"。究其缘由,主要是法治社会下"‘内在观点’的提出、‘社会合意’的发展、对社会功利主义的批判、‘权威’理论的阐扬"使得法律强制力呈现"被弱化"之趋势。具体表征上,法律强制力已由传统的法律"硬性"发展至当代的法律"柔性。Different from legal force in traditional society, the connotation of "contemporary" in the term of contemporary social legal force, judging from its orientation, has evolved from the traditional" suppressive or compul- sory force" to "internal or self - regulating force". The chief reason is that the formulation of "internal view- points" in legal society, the development of "social consensus", the critique of social utilitarianism and the in- terpretation of "authoritative" theory have allowed legal force to display a tendency of "being attenuated". Specifically, legal force has developed from traditional legal "hardness" to contemporary legal "softness"
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222