检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏新
出 处:《中国医学创新》2012年第5期79-80,共2页Medical Innovation of China
摘 要:目的探讨两分群、三分群血细胞计数仪白细胞分类计数与人工分类计数的差异,为基层医院获取更准确的结果提供参考。方法选取18~20岁健康男性72例,女性42例,静脉取EDTA-Na2抗凝血2ml,同时用三种仪器和人工方法进行白细胞分类计数。结果仪器分类与人工分类比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论三分群或两分群血细胞计数仪虽有较好的准确性和快捷性,但不能完全依赖仪器,只能作为一种初筛手段,不能完全代替显微镜下人工白细胞分类,两者结合才能使结果更准确。Objective To explore the differences between the two groups, three group - dividing blood count instrument white blood cells classification count and artificial classification count, and to provide more accurate results and the reference. Methods 18 -20 healthy male 72 cases, female 42 patients were selected and taken EDTA - Na2 anticoagulant with 2 ml from venous, and at the same time, white blood cell count were done by the three instruments and artificial classification. Results The instrument classification and artificial classifi- cation were significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion In the use of three groups or two duster - dependent blood count instrument, al- though there are better accuracy and quick, but it can't completely dependent on instrument. It is only as a means of early screening, and can't completely replace the microscopic artificial classification of white blood cells, two kinds of methods make the result more accurate complementary.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28