检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋文华[1] 吴衍翠[1] 谢飞[1,2] 李庆功[1,2] 李克荣[1,3]
机构地区:[1]天津工业大学,天津300381 [2]天津市公安消防局,天津300381 [3]中国安全生产科学研究院,北京100012
出 处:《中国安全生产科学技术》2012年第1期108-113,共6页Journal of Safety Science and Technology
基 金:天津市科技计划项目(编号:10ZCGYSF01600);国家自然科学基金项目(编号:50974096)
摘 要:以催化裂化装置为例子,分别运用危险度评价法与蒙德法两种评价法分别进行评价,得出的评价结论既有共同点也有区别。通过危险度评价法与蒙德法评分项目的比较分析,得出危险度评价法与蒙德法的内在区别与联系,验证了上述例子结论,同时得出蒙德法将危险度评价进行了拓展与延伸,它将危险度评价法得出的危险性高的单元,更深入的找出导致危险性高的原因与参数。Taking the catalytic cracker as an example,the evalnations were conducted by separately using the risk factor appraisal law and the mond process method.The obtained appraisal conclusion had both the common ground and the difference.Through the comparative analysis on grading project risk factor appraisal law and the mond process,the intrinsic difference and the relation of risk factor appraisal law and the mond process was obtained.It confirmed the above example conclusion,and simultaneously it was obtained that the mond process is the development and extend of the risk factor appraisal.It analyzed the unit obtained the risk factor appraisal law,more thorough discovered the reason and the parameter of higher risk.
分 类 号:X913.4[环境科学与工程—安全科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3