Some notes on betting commitment distance in evidence theory  

作　　者：HAN DeQiang DENG Yong HAN ChongZhao YANG Yi 

机构地区：[1]MOE KLINNS Lab,SKLMSE Lab,Institute of Integrated Automation,School of Electronics a Information Engineering,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710049,China [2]School of Electronics and Information Technology,Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200240,China [3]School of Aerospace,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710049,China

出　　处：《Science China(Information Sciences)》2012年第3期558-565,共8页中国科学（信息科学）（英文版）

基　　金：supported by National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2007CB311006);National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61104214, 61004087);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities;China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 20100481337);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation-Special Fund (Grant No. 201104670);supported by the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 60921003);Research Fund of Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Electronic Information System Integration (Grant No. 201101Y17)

摘　　要：The distance of evidence, which represents the degree of dissimilarity between bodies of evidence, has attracted more and more interest and has found extensive uses in many realms. In this paper some notes on a widely used distance of evidence, i.e., betting commitment distance, are provided, including the arguments on the rationality of its definition, some misuses and some counter-intuitive behaviors of betting commitment distance. Several numerical examples are also provided to support and verify our arguments.

关 键 词：pignistic probability evidence theory betting commitment distance distance of evidence 

分 类 号：TP18[自动化与计算机技术—控制理论与控制工程] O157.5[自动化与计算机技术—控制科学与工程]