检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭怀午[1] 杨晓峰[1] 冯长青[1] 刘方锐[2]
机构地区:[1]内蒙古电力勘测设计院,呼和浩特010020 [2]华中科技大学电气与电子工程学院,武汉430074
出 处:《太阳能学报》2012年第2期230-235,共6页Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金重点项目(50837003);国家重点基础研究发展计划(2009CB219701)
摘 要:分别采用线性相关方法、物理方法和支持向量机(SVM)方法对内蒙古不同地形的两个风电场进行了基于邻近测风塔2个月学习数据的10个月平均风速估算研究,给出了较详细的实现过程,并比较了3种估算方法的预测精度。计算结果表明,线性相关方法能快速给出预测结果,但要求两塔之间的空间相关性良好;物理方法对较平坦地形估算结果精度较高,但对于较复杂地形估算结果平均百分比误差高达15%;SVM方法能给出精度较高的估算结果,在两个风电场的估算平均百分比误差均小于5%,对复杂地形适应性强,综合结果好于其他两种方法。Three methods were investigated to evaluate ten-month wind speed based on the two-month learning data of the neighboring masts, which located in two wind farms with different terrains in Inner Mongolia. The adopted strategies were linear correlation method, physical method and the support vector machine (SVM) method. The performance of three estimation methods were comprehensively compared. The calculated results show that the linear correlation method can yield the estimation results quickly, while the good spatial correlation between the two masts is required ; the physical method performs excellently for the fiat terrain, while its performance is poor for the complex terrain with the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 15% ; the SVM method functions well for the two wind farms with the MAPE less than 5%. Therefore, the SVM method is robust for the complex terrain and exceeds other two methods in a whole.
分 类 号:TK81[动力工程及工程热物理—流体机械及工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222