检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《岩土工程学报》2012年第2期230-236,共7页Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(41172251)
摘 要:为了解决曲面基础作用于土体的极限承载力问题,改进了Prandtl机构和Hill机构,利用极限分析理论,得到了底面为曲面基础地基极限承载力的上限解;通过两者的比较,以及与底面为平面基础地基极限承载力的比较,所得的上限解大于处于地基表面的平面基础地基极限承载力的上限解,小于埋深为基础宽度一半的平面基础地基极限承载力的上限解,研究结果可供地基承载力设计及计算参考。The bearing capacity of curved footing over foundation soil is considered. In order to solve the ultimate bearing capacity of curved footing on the soil, the Prandtl and the Hill mechanisms are improved. The kinematic approach of the limit analysis is used to calculate the average limit pressure under footings. Using the limit analysis methods, the upper bound solutions of the ultimate bearing capacity are obtained. By comparison, the solutions are greater than those of the ultimate bearing capacity of the plane footing and less than those of the ultimate bearing capacity of the plane footing with which the buried depth is half the width. The analytical solutions can be used for calculation of curved footing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90