《神农本草经》与宋本《伤寒论》《金匮要略》“消”类药名实差异考辨  

Differences of concept and entity of xiao-named herb between Shennong＇ s Herbal Classic and Songedition Treatise on Febrile Disease and Golden Chamber

作　　者：杨金萍[1] 王振国[1] 卢星[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东中医药大学文献所,济南250355

出　　处：《中华医史杂志》2012年第1期8-11,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical History

基　　金：国家重点基础研究发展（973）计划“中药药性理论相关基础问题研究”（编号：2007CB512601）

摘　　要：《神农本草经》与宋本《伤寒论》、《金匮要略》中“消”类药材的名实存在很大差异。造成这种差异的主要原因是：①在汉代至宋代的历史发展过程中，药材品类鉴别、功效区分及用药倾向不断发生变化，导致了不同时期药物名实的差异；②宋人林亿在校定张仲景的著作时，有可能根据当时的实际用药情况，对张仲景原书中的药名进行了厘定。There are significant differences of the XIAO-named herb between Shennong＇ s Herbal Classic and the Song - edition Treatise on Febrile Disease and Synopsis of the Golden Chamber. The reasons are： （1）With the development of history, differentiation of herb category and effect kept changing from the Han Dynasty to the Song Dynasty, which led to the differences in concept and entity of herbs in different periods. （2）Lin Yi of the Song Dynasty may have redefined some herb＇ s names according to the current situation when he revised Zhang Zhongjing＇ s works.

关 键 词：神农本草经 宋本《伤寒论》 消石 芒消 朴消 

分 类 号：R2[医药卫生—中医学]