谁动了谁的奶酪?——《婚姻法解释(三)》不动产若干问题研究  

Who Moved the Cheese:Research on the Articles about Real Estate in Judicial Explanation(Ⅲ) of Marriage Law

作　　者：邢昊然[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200240

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2011年第6期51-56,共6页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：《婚姻法解释(三)》在父母赠与不动产的问题上的规定充分考虑了赠与人的意愿,具有合理性。其第7条第一款实际上遵从了物权法规定的不动产归属原则,在一方父母赠与房屋的情况下,所有权归属应以登记为准。《婚姻法解释(三)》第10条不仅不会对女方不利,相反对于女性进行了一定程度的倾斜保护。其不是一种认定婚前个人财产的情形,而是确立了特殊情况下夫妻离婚后不动产的分配规则,在婚姻关系存续期间,不动产应由夫妻共同共有。何谓个人财产的"投资收益"、"孳息"和"自然增值"亟待法律加以明确,不动产适用善意取得制度并不会侵害共有人的生存权。On the issue of granted real estate from parents,Judicial Explanation（Ⅲ） of Marriage Law considered the givers＇ willingness reasonably.The first term of Article 7 actually is in consistence with the Property Law.If the parents of husband or wife presented the couple with real estate,the ownership of the building should be confirmed by the building property registration.Article 10 doesn＇t go against women＇s rights;on the contrary,it gives female some extra protection.It is not a basis to confirm one＇s prenuptial property,but a method to distribute the property.The real estate should be owned by both of the couple during the marriage.The meaning of ＂investment＂,＂fruits＂ and ＂unearned increment＂ should be clarified.The application of acquisition in good faith in real estate fields will not violate one＇s right to live.

关 键 词：《婚姻法解释(三)》 不动产 登记 离婚 

分 类 号：D923.9[政治法律—民商法学]