工业脉冲噪声对冲压工听力影响的调查  被引量:4

A survey on effect of industrial impulse noise on hearing in workers for punching

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:祖爱华[1] 崔晨[1] 王欣[1] 李红梅[1] 莫民帅[1] 赖洪飘[1] 

机构地区:[1]深圳市南山区疾病预防控制中心,518054

出  处:《国际医药卫生导报》2012年第3期429-433,共5页International Medicine and Health Guidance News

摘  要:目的研究工业脉冲噪声对冲压工听力的影响。方法选择442名冲压工、128名研磨工分别为脉冲噪声组和稳态噪声接触组,另选择208名非噪声作业的装配工为对照组;对其纯音气导听阈测试结果进行统计分析。结果44.3%冲压工被检出高频听力损失,4.1%冲压工被检出观察对象,2.0%冲压丁被检出疑似噪声聋,脉冲噪声对听力损害高于稳态噪声组(P〈0.01)。冲压工累积噪声暴露量(CNE)每增加1dB(A)·年,出现听力损失的风险相应增加12.3%(P〈0.01);研磨工累积噪声暴露量(CNE)每增加1dB(A)·年,听力损失的风险相应增加9.3%(P〈0.05)。结论工业脉冲噪声对听力的损害大于稳态噪声。Objective To explore the effect of industrial impulse noise on hearing in workers for punching. Methods 442 workers for punching and 128 workers for grinding were assigned to impulse noise group and steady-state noise group 208 assembly workers without noise exposure were selected as control group. The results of pure-tone air conduction threshold audiometry were analyze. Results High-frequency hearing loss was detectable in 44.3% of the workers for punching observed objects was in 4.1%; and noise-induced deafness was in 2.0%. Rate of hearing loss was higher in the impulse noise group than in the steady-state noise group ( P 〈 0.01 ). With an elevation in CNE of ldB ( A ) year, the risk of hearing loss in the workers for punching increased 12.3% ( P〈 0.01 ) and the risk in those for grinding increased 9.3% ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions Industrial impulse noise is worse than steady-state noise in damage to hearing.

关 键 词:脉冲噪声 稳态噪声 听力损失 累积噪声暴露量 

分 类 号:R131[医药卫生—劳动卫生]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象