检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李可[1]
机构地区:[1]东南大学法学院,南京211189
出 处:《哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第2期49-53,共5页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究指导项目"法学方法论之本真"(2010SJD820014)
摘 要:可以说,价值判断之客观化是法律方法论上的一个根本难题。价值判断的客观性在本质上是一个判决的可预期性问题,由此揭开了人们探寻一个客观的判断标准之序幕。实证主义、本质主义和个案主义等进路各有优劣,必须在"适合个案"原则的指导下予以安排和协调。由是亦揭示了诸如文化、程序、规范和事实等有利于价值判断之客观化的因素,在"司法目的"的指引下亦可整合达成前述目的之机制。Objection of value judgment is a fundamental problem in legal methodology. The objectivity of value judgment is essentially a predictability problem of judgment, thus revealing the prelude to seek an objective judgment standard of that. These approaches such as positivism and individual - case have their own advantages and disadvantages which must be arranged and coordinated under the principle of "suit for individual case". Thus it also reveals the factors such as culture, procedure, norm and fact which are beneficial to the objectification of value judgment and can be also integrated into a mechanism for the foregoing purposes under the guidance of "judicial purpose".]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229