检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨德桥[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088 [2]内蒙古科技大学文法学院,内蒙古包头014010
出 处:《北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第1期35-44,共10页Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:"签字或盖章"是我国合同法所规定的书面合同取信制度,该制度未区分自然人和法人而一体规制,在实践中产生了有悖公平的不良后果。本文立基于法律史和比较法的角度,对书面合同取信制度进行了系统的梳理,总结了我国古代和国外书面合同的取信制度,在此基础上评价了我国现行合同法的相关规定。本文认为,私章自身的内在局限及签名取信的多维优势,决定了签名取代私章的必然;我国合同法应该明确规定,自然人主体书面契约的取信方式只能是签名。"Signature or seal" is the trust system of written contract in Chinese Contract Law. However, this system does not distinguish the essential difference between natural person and legal person, which brings the unfair consequences in practice. Based on the perspectives of the legal history and comparative law, the paper makes a systematical analysis of the trust system of written contract, and summarizes the system in China' s ancient law and foreign law, based on which this paper evaluates Chinese current Contract Law. It points out the signature will inevitably replace the private seal, owing to the limitations of the private seal and the multidimen sional advantages of the signature. The Contract Law of our country should clearly clarify that the signature would be the only trust system of natural person' s written contract.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33