检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:欧燕妮[1] 梁祖兰[1] 叶婉华[1] 纪海玲[1] 高宗娥[1]
机构地区:[1]华南肿瘤学国家重点实验室中山大学肿瘤防治中心内镜激光科,广东广州510060
出 处:《现代临床护理》2012年第1期31-32,共2页Modern Clinical Nursing
摘 要:目的观察邻苯二甲醛(o-phthalaldehyde,OPA)对内镜的消毒效果。方法将60个使用过的内镜随机分为观察组和对照组各30个,观察组应用OPA进行内镜消毒,对照组应用2%戊二醛进行内镜消毒。消毒后比较两种消毒剂消毒内镜的效果、时间及消毒液使用周期。结果两种消毒液对内镜消毒效果比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),但是观察组消毒时间明显短于对照组,而且使用周期较长。结论OPA是一种安全、快捷、有效的消毒液,可用于内镜消毒,可缩短消毒时间,加快内镜设备的周转,缓解内镜供给压力。Objective To evaluate the efficacy of o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) in the disinfections of endoscopes. Methods Sixty used endoscopes were equally randomized into two groups: the experiment group and the control group. OPA and 2% glutaral were used to disinfect the endoscopes in the experiment group and in the control group, respectively. Samples .were collected from the channel and surface of all the endoscopes for bacteria culture after disinfection. The disinfection efficacy, time and cycle of the disinfections were compared between the two groups. Result The disinfection efficacy of two groups was not significantly different (P 〉 0.05), but the disinfection time in the experiment group was shorter than the control group. Conclusions OPA was an efficient and convenient antiseptic for the disinfection of endoscopes. It may shorten the disinfection time, accelerate the turnover of endoscopes and raise work efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117