检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学汽车学院,上海201804 [2]东京大学生产技术研究所
出 处:《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》2012年第2期281-285,共5页Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基 金:国家"八六三"高技术研究发展计划(2007AA04Z132)
摘 要:对气袋织物的各向异性材料模型进行研究,将织物的拉伸和剪切仿真与试验结果对比,以验证材料模型的准确性.分别采用控制体积法(Control Volume,CV)与近年来新开发的粒子法(Corpuscular Method,CPM),对平铺与折叠气囊展开进行数值模拟,并对比气囊展开形态和压力结果对比.结果表明,CV方法只适用于IP(In-Position)乘员与气囊作用的仿真模拟,而CPM方法可模拟出气囊展开初期的高速气流运动,且计算效率较高,适用于OOP(Out-of-Position)乘员与气囊的相互作用仿真.A study was made of the accuracy of anisotropic material model for airbag fabric. The material tensile and shear simulation results were compared with experimental results to verify the validity of material model. Then the deployment of flat and folded airbag was simulated, based on control volume (CV) method and recently developed corpuscular method (CPM) separately. And the simulation results were compared and discussed. It is concluded that CV method is only suitable for simulating the airbag and IP occupant interaction, while CPM accounts for the interaction of high speed gas flow and airbag fabric in the early phase of deployment, and it can be applied to simulating the interaction of out-of-position (OOP) occupant and airbag with high computational efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.14