论真正连带与不真正连带——以区分标准、立法模式和法律效果为视角  

On Real Joint Liability and Non-real Joint Liability——From the Perspective of Identification Standards, Legislation Mode and Legislative Effect

作　　者：王晓雯[1] 章正璋[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《吉林省教育学院学报》2012年第3期99-101,共3页Journal of Jilin Provincial Institute of Education

基　　金：江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目:"不真正连带债务的理论建构与实践路径"的阶段性成果;项目批准号为2011SJB820014

摘　　要：连带债务与不真正连带债务在构成要件上没有本质区别,它们的主要区别在于发生原因,连带债务的产生具有法律的明确规定或者当事人的明确约定,而不真正连带债务则主要表现为请求权竞合。连带债务与不真正连带债务均具有对内和对外两个方面的效力,它们的法律效果正日趋统一。There are no essential differences between the joint obligation and the untrue joint obligation,the essential difference between them is that they possess different debt cause. The joint obligation results from the legislations or the contracts ,while the untrue joint obligation results from the competition of the Claims. Both of them have the internal aud external effeets, step and step the effeets of them have been unified.

关 键 词：真正连带 不真正连带 区分标准 法律效果 

分 类 号：D922.29[政治法律—经济法学]