石膏托和夹板外固定治疗桡骨远端伸直型骨折的疗效比较  

Comparison Study of Small Splinting and Plaster Cast External Fixation for the Treatment of Extension Fracture in the Distal Radius

作　　者：王猛[1] 何向阳[1] 郭仪林[1] 林国叶[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京军区福州总医院第一附属医院骨一区,福州351100

出　　处：《医学综述》2012年第4期638-639,共2页Medical Recapitulate

摘　　要：目的比较杉树皮夹板和石膏托外固定治疗桡骨远端伸直型骨折的疗效。方法桡骨远端伸直型骨折患者96例,随机分为夹板固定组和石膏固定组,其中夹板固定组48例,骨折手法复位后全部予以杉树皮夹板外固定。石膏固定组48例,手法复位后全部予以石膏托外固定。两组观察时间均为6～8周。结果夹板固定组的优良率高于石膏固定组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论杉树皮夹板外固定在提高患者骨折愈合的优良率及促进骨折愈合和功能恢复方面比石膏托外固定更有优势。Objective To Compare the effect of fir bark splint and plaster cast external fixation for the treatment of extension fracture in the distal radius.Methods 96 patients with extension fracture in the distal radius were randomly divided into two groups and treated by fir bark splint fixation or plaster cast fixation.There were 48 patients in the fir bark splint group,using fir bark splint after manipulative reduction.There were 48 patients in the plaster group,using plaster casts after manipulative reduction.Observation time of two groups was 6-8 weeks.Results The excellent rate of fir bark splint group was better than that of the plaster group（P〈0.05）.Conclusion Fir bark splint could increase the excellent rate and promote fracture healing as well as function recovery better than plaster cast external fixation.

关 键 词：小夹板 石膏托 桡骨远端骨折 外固定 

分 类 号：R683.41[医药卫生—骨科学]