检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湘潭大学公共管理学院
出 处:《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2012年第2期73-76,共4页Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“地方政府公共事业的管理绩效评估与模式创新研究”(05BZZ014)
摘 要:政府绩效评估制度与行政问责制度在内在理念、实现机制、现实功能方面存在着相似与趋同性。积极推进政府绩效评估与行政问责的制度整合,有助于实现政府绩效评估问责功能的完善,有助于实现两者的协调推进和优势互补。然而,两者在制度层面的整合,面临来自权力上的协调、内容上的整合和法规上的衔接这三个方面的挑战。当前,推进这两者的整合,可从树立整合绩效评估与行政问责制度的理念,实现绩效评估与行政问责两者体系上的衔接,健全绩效评估与行政问责制度整合的制度保障,逐步开展绩效评估与行政问责制度整合的改革试点这四个方面入手。There is some similar and convergence in the idea, the realization mechanism, reality function between the government performance evaluation system and the administration accountability system. It can help to realize consummating of the function of performance evaluation and accountability of government, and achieve both the coordinated advance and complementary advantages to promote the performance evaluation of government and the administration accountability system integration actively. However, there are three challenges in the integration of the system fi'om the coordination of power, content integration and the link of regulations. It can promote the integration of the evaluation system of government perfor- mance and administration accountability from setting up the integration of performance evaluation and administration ac- countability system in the concept, realizing the performance evaluation and administration accountability system in the cohesion, perfecting the performance evaluation and administration accountability system integration sysytem, developing the pilot reform of the performance evaluation and administration accountability system integration gradually.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.242.216