检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学经济学院
出 处:《财经科学》2012年第3期33-41,共9页Finance & Economics
基 金:中国博士后科学基金资助项目(项目号:20110490236)
摘 要:现有转轨经济理论研究中鲜有对转轨国家的技术创新效率问题进行探讨,而技术创新是转轨国家经济持续增长的源动力。基于此,本文运用整体分析和分段分析的研究方法,对24个转轨国家的技术创新效率进行了评价和比较,发现渐进式改革的国家技术创新效率从整体上高于激进式改革的国家,并且从其阶段变化动态来看,前者的效率提升幅度也大于后者。同时,需要指出的是转轨国家技术创新效率远远低于世界平均水平,未来转轨国家应该在政策和行动中加大对技术创新的投入力度,进一步提高研发支出在GDP中的比例,加快创新型国家的建设步伐,以便尽快赶上并超过世界技术创新效率的平均水平。Few literatures in transition economics discussed the technological innovation efficiency among transition countries; however, technological innovation is the source of national economy sustainable development. Based on that, the paper utilized overall comparison and divided comparison methodology to appraise the technological innovation level in 24 transition countries, the finding revealed that the technological innovation efficiency in incremental reform countries is higher than in radical reform countries, moreover, from dynamic change at different development phase, the efficiency improvement deviation in incremental reform countries is much larger than in radical reform countries. But we still need to point out that, the technological innovation efficiency in both incremental and radical reform countries is much lower than world average level, indicating that transition countries still need to go a long way to catch up with or surpass the world average level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.136.26.17