美、英、澳图书馆立法现状及其借鉴意义  

Status Quo of American,Britain and Australian Library Legislation and Its Reference

作　　者：徐毅[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽省明光市图书馆,安徽明光239400

出　　处：《图书馆建设》2012年第2期1-4,共4页Library Development

摘　　要：相对于美国、英国、澳大利亚等发达国家图书馆立法进程与内容,我国图书馆立法较为滞后,与基层公共图书馆工作密切相关的法律内容欠缺,对于图书馆立法基础、免费开放、资源共享、弱势群体服务、读者隐私权保护等的规定不细致。因此,我国图书馆立法需要借鉴国外图书馆立法的理念与经验,强调图书馆属于全民,细化立法内容,关注弱势群体,以法律形式保障馆际资源共享,注重读者隐私权保护。Comparing with the library legislation process and contents of America, British and Australia, Chinese library legislation is laggard and lack of laws related to works of primary level public libraries, and regulations such as legislation basis, free opening, resource sharing, services for vulnerable group, protection of readers＇ privacy are not detailed enough. Therefore, we should draw lessons from ideas and experience of library legislation in foreign countries, emphasize libraries belonging to the people, refine the legislation content, pay more attention to disadvantaged groups, guarantee the interlibrary resources sharing in the form of legislation, and stress on the protection of readers＇ privacy.

关 键 词：图书馆立法免费开放资源共享弱势群体隐私权保护 

分 类 号：G252.3[文化科学—图书馆学]