检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵苗苗[1] 孟庆跃[1] 李慧[1] 李军[2] 李林贵[3] 王翠丽[1] Stephen Nicholas
机构地区:[1]山东大学卫生管理与政策研究中心,济南250012 [2]山东大学公共卫生学院,济南250012 [3]宁夏医科大学管理学院,银川750004 [4]澳大利亚纽卡斯尔大学商业与法律学院
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2012年第3期45-47,共3页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:美国中华医学基金会项目(CMB09-947)
摘 要:目的:了解我国贫困农村地区留守儿童与非留守儿童卫生服务利用差异,探索制约卫生服务利用的原因,为提高贫困农村地区儿童健康公平性提供实证依据和政策建议。方法:采用分层整群抽样的方法对宁夏固原市2 017名儿童和其中1 474名儿童的家长进行问卷调查,并对部分家长进行访谈,获取儿童、家庭基本情况和儿童卫生服务利用等信息。结果:留守儿童与非留守儿童四周患病率分别为34.9%和30.6%,四周内患病儿童的就诊率分别为65.4%和80.3%。结论:与非留守儿童相比,贫困农村地区留守儿童卫生服务利用表现出"高患病率、低就诊率"的特点,家庭经济条件差是限制其卫生服务利用的关键因素。Objective: To realize health services utilization disparity between left'behind children and non-left-behind children in poor rural areas in China, explore relative influencing factors and provide empirical evidence and policy suggestions to improve children's health equity in poor rural areas. Methods: Doing the stratified cluster sampling survey on 2 017 children in Guyuan, Ningxia Province, 1 474 corresponding household and children's health services utilization information and some qualitative interview information. Results: Prevalence rates of left-behind children and non-left-behind children in 4 weeks were 34.9% and 30.6% respectively, and visiting rates of people who were sick in last 4 weeks were 65.4% and 80.3% respectively. Conclusion: Left-behind children were much easier to get sick, but had less probability to get outpatient services than non,left-behind children in poor rural areas. Family financial difficulty was the vital factor, which limited health services utilization of left-behind Children.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157