检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]云南大学人文学院历史系
出 处:《南亚研究》2012年第1期45-70,共26页South Asian Studies
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目<西南边疆项目>之<中印国家关系中的涉藏问题研究>;云南大学专门史国家重点学科建设的阶段研究成果
摘 要:印度尼赫鲁政府认为,1954年与中国达成的《中印协定》已全盘解决了中国与印度间所有悬而未决的问题,而该协定及其谈判均未涉及边界问题,因此中印间不存在边界问题。尼赫鲁政府对协定的这一解读是其在中印边界问题上推行单边主义、施展外交谋略蓄意制造的,其目的在于将印度关于边界问题的单方面主张强加于中国,将其对"麦克马洪线"以南争议地区的侵占合法化。The Nehru Government asserted that all the outstanding problems between China and India had been settled by Sino-Indian Agreement concluded in 1954. However, border disputes between the two countries had not been mentioned in this Agreement, no border issues were raised during the time of negotiations for this Agreement. Therefore, according to the Nehru Government, there were no border disputes between the two countries. In fact, this explanation to the Agreement of 1954, as is mentioned above, was fabricated deliberately by the Nehru government on the purpose of its unilateralism and diplomatic strategy concerning the Sino-Indian boundary issues. The intention of the Nehru government was to impose on China its unilateral position ize its occupation of the disputed areas south of the boundary issues, and to legalize its occupation of thedisputed areas south of the illegal McMahon Line.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.226.67