论票据单纯交付转让的效力  

Discuss On Validity Of Transferring Bills Without Endorsement

作　　者：董翠香[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《法学论坛》2012年第2期146-151,共6页Legal Forum

摘　　要：我国票据立法并未明确规定票据单纯交付的效力,理论界主流观点认为,票据只能通过背书方式转让,不能以单纯交付方式转让。传统票据法理论同时认可票据背书与单纯交付转让的效力,世界各国和地区票据立法均认可票据单纯交付的效力,我国司法实践也普遍承认票据单纯交付转让的效力。我国《票据法》应当明确规定票据转让方式及空白票据转让方式,承认票据单纯交付转让的效力。The validity of transferring bills without endorsement isn＇ t stipulated in our law of bill. The major academic view be- lieves that bills can only be transferred with endorsement. However, the validity of transferring bills with and without endorsement are both recognized in traditional theories of bill transferring. Many other countries acknowledge the validity of transferring bills without endorsement, so does our judicial practice. Therefore, the methodology of transferring bills （includes blank bills）should be accurately legislated by the law of bill, where as the validity of transferring bills without endorsement needs to be recognized.

关 键 词：票据背书 票据单纯交付 无记名支票 空白票据 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]