检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林坚[1]
机构地区:[1]深圳市中医院,广东深圳518033
出 处:《中华中医药学刊》2012年第3期658-660,共3页Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨中西医结合治疗原发性肾病综合征临床疗效。方法:将108例确诊为原发性肾病综合征患者随机分成两组,治疗组56例,在激素或环磷酰胺的治疗基础上,本组每例患者根据辨证分型给予中药治疗;对照组52例,每例患者只给予激素或环磷酰胺常规治疗;2个月后观察两组临床疗效、肾功能、血脂和炎症因子等指标的变化情况。结果:治疗组总有效91.07%,对照组总有效80.77%,差异有显著性(P<0.05);治疗组在改善肾功能、血脂、炎症因子等水平均明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:在治疗原发性肾病综合征患者的临床疗效及各项检测指标上,中西医结合治疗优于单用西药治疗。Objective: Study on the clinical efficacy of Integrative Medicine treatment of Primary Nephrotic Syndrome was made. Methods: 108 patients diagnosed with Primary Nephrotic Syndrome were randomly divided into two groups, treatment group had 56 patients, based on the steroid or eyelophosphamide treatment, each patient in this group was given traditional Chinese medicine based on syndrome differentiation; the control group had 52 patients, each patient was given conventional treatment with hormones or cyelophosphamide only ; after 2 months, observe the clinical efficacy, renal func- tion, blood lipids and inflammatory factors and other indicators of the changes. Results :The total effective was 91.07% in treatment group, 80.77% in control group, difference was significant (P 〈 O. 05 ) ; treatment group in improving kidney function, blood lipids, inflammatory factors were significantly better than the control group ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion : In the treatment of patients with Primary Nephrotic Syndrome by clinical efficacy and other test targets, Integrative Medicine is superior to Western Medicine alone.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3