检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张璐[1]
出 处:《上海大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第2期40-52,共13页Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:上海市第三期重点学科"经济法学"资助(S30902)
摘 要:化石能源立法与可再生能源立法无论在法律理性还是在立法进程的规划安排上,均存在较多的问题,也都具有较大的发展完善空间。为避免这两个关联性较强的立法领域在发展完善过程中可能遭遇的"同步性困境",有必要以对化石能源和可再生能源各自物品属性的特殊性分析为基础,研究化石能源和可再生能源立法的差异性。化石能源具有较为明显的私人物品属性,决定了化石能源立法必须将物权制度作为法律逻辑起点,并以物权与行政权有效衔接、互补为主线进行制度构建。可再生能源具有比较鲜明的公共物品特性,由此决定可再生能源立法只能将行政权作为基本的内生变量,并建立以行政权为主导的可再生能源立法制度结构。There are many problems as well as large space to improve in the law logos and laying out of legislations on fossil energy and renewable energy. To avoid the " synchronicity predicament" the two closelyrelated legislation areas that may encounter in the course of development, it is necessary to analyze the article attributes of fossil energy and renewable energy respectively and therefore, to find out the differences between legislations on them. Since fossil energy is with distinct private article attribute, its legislation should be con- ducted with the real right system as the logical starting point and focus on the connection and complement of real right and executive power. As to renewable energy which is of public article attribute, its legislation should be carried out with executive power as the basic endogenous variable and dominant factor.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7