不同分析方法测定尿铅的比较  

Comparative Study on Determination of Uric Lead By Different Methods

作　　者：王凤兰[1] 刘艳[1] 张荔彦[1,2] 徐锐 

机构地区：[1]沈阳医学院,沈阳110031 [2]辽宁大学分析测试中心

出　　处：《中国公共卫生》2000年第2期184-184,共1页Chinese Journal of Public Health

基　　金：辽宁省教委课题

摘　　要：We measured the level of uric lead in workers exposured and nonexposured lead by DPSA,GFAAS and DCM.The basic parameters of the three methods demonstrated that sensitivity and precision of DPSA and GFAAS excelled that of DCM,but the linear range of DPSA and GFAAS are more narrow than that of DCM.All of The three methods had excellent accuracy(paired t-test P>0 05).The results showed the different of the three methods no significant.We measured the level of uric lead in workers exposured and nonexposured lead by DPSA,GFAAS and DCM.The basic parameters of the three methods demonstrated that sensitivity and precision of DPSA and GFAAS excelled that of DCM,but the linear range of DPSA and GFAAS are more narrow than that of DCM.All of The three methods had excellent accuracy(paired t-test P>0 05).The results showed the different of the three methods no significant.

关 键 词：铅中毒 尿铅 测定方法 比较分析 

分 类 号：R135.11[医药卫生—劳动卫生]