检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]昆明医学院第二附属医院,云南昆明650101
出 处:《实用妇产科杂志》2012年第3期235-237,共3页Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
摘 要:目的:评价超声引导穿刺诊断疑是卵巢癌的盆腔结核的价值,为盆腔结核的鉴别诊断寻找一种可靠、经济的方法。方法:对26例确诊为盆腔结核的患者进行回顾性分析,比较超声引导穿刺、腹腔镜或开腹手术诊断盆腔结核的诊断率及住院时间、费用等。结果:26例盆腔结核患者,行超声引导穿刺诊断14例,确诊13例,诊断率92.9%;行腹腔镜及开腹手术诊断6例、7例(其中1例为超声引导穿刺未确诊病例),均确诊,诊断率均100.0%,3组间诊断率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。超声引导穿刺组住院天数最短、住院费用以及患者术后不适感最低,各项均显著低于腹腔镜组和开腹手术组(P<0.05)。结论:女性盆腔结核与晚期卵巢癌鉴别诊断困难,若高度怀疑盆腔结核行超声引导穿刺是一种可靠、经济的诊断方法。[ Abstract] Objective:To evaluate the value of ultrasound-guided needle biopsy in the diagnosis of pelvic tuberculosis suspected of ovarian carcinoma. Methods :26 patients diagnosed as pelvic tuberculosis by ultra- sound-guided needle biopsy, laparoscopy or laparotomy from October 2001 to October 2010 were retrospec- tively analyzed, the diagnostic accuracy and hospitalization cost and time of the three methods were com- pared. Results. Of the 26 patients, 14 had ultrasound-guided needle biopsy, 13 had accurate diagnosis, thediagnostic rate was 92.9%. 6 patients had accurate diagnosis by laparoscopy and ~ pat0ents Dy iaparotomy, the diagnostic rates were both 100%, there were no significant differences on the diagnostic rate among the three methods( P 〉 O. 05 ). The patients who had ultrasound guided needle biopsy had shortest hospital stay, the least inpatient cost and postoperative discomfort compared with the other two methods ( P 〈 O. 05). Conclusions.Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy is a reliable and economic diagnostic method when suspec- ting pelvic tuberculosis, especially when it is difficult to differentially diagnose with ovarian cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28