检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]吉林大学行政学院
出 处:《吉林大学社会科学学报》2012年第2期61-66,159,共6页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基 金:教育部2009年规划基金项目(09YJA810008);国家社会科学基金重大课题攻关项目(10ZD&040);吉林大学国家"985"哲学社会科学创新基地项目
摘 要:公共政策效能问题是公共政策研究的焦点议题。作为对社会资源进行权威性分配的公共政策,应以社会公平为价值取向来实现社会成员福利的最大化。西方学术界对公共政策效能进行分析的精英模式和政治过程模式,都存在着自身难以克服的缺陷和不足。提高公共政策效能的路径选择,在于政策制定者的价值偏好和公众意愿之间的有效衔接和互动,这一有效衔接的桥梁和纽带便是公共舆论。The effectiveness of public policy is the key issue in public policy studies.As an authoritarian tool in the distribution of social resources,public policy's value orientation should be the realization of the maximized welfare of social members.The two models in the west public policy studies in analyzing the effectiveness of public policy that are the model of elite and the model of political process both are with shortages that they can not overcome by themselves.This article raises the idea that the channel to improve the efficacy of public policy is based on the effective combination and interaction of the elite preference and the public will,which is public opinion.On the forum that public opinion provided,the public and elite seriously express and select public policy choices that both overcome the narrowness in elite preferences and dissolve the rational ignorance of the public in public policy participation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249