检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张金娟[1]
出 处:《中国房地产(学术版)》2012年第2期72-80,共9页China Real Estate
基 金:教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(10YJC630383);天津商业大学青年科研培育基金项目(091103)
摘 要:当前众多小区物业管理面临困境,其中有多方面原因,但是业主群体治理滞后是一个突出问题。本文运用新制度经济学的相关理论,分析业主群体集体行动中面临的困境,采用案例研究方法,系统梳理了深圳景洲大厦和天津诚基中心国际公寓业主群体治理的历程,并对其治理效果进行了对比和评价。研究结果表明,业主群体规模及其群体特征的一致性程度会对其治理效果产生显著影响。进而提出,应针对不同小区物业及其业主群体的特点,分别采取内部参与式治理模式和多方共济式治理模式,只有这样才能持续推进小区物业业主群体民主决策的进程,实现小区物业良好、持续的管理。At present,many residential buildings are facing dilemmas of building management.The lag problem of the owners group governance is one of the most important reasons.The collective action dilemmas of owners group are deeply analyzed by using the new institutional economics theories.Making use of the case study method,the governance processes are systematic sorted out in Shenzhen Jingzhou Building and Tianjin Chengji Center International Apartment.It is indicated that the scale and the consistency degree can significantly influence the governance effects.In order to propel the owners' decision process and improve the management,two different kinds of owners group governance model can be adopted according to the characteristics of the residential buildings and the owners,i.e.inner-participant governance model and multi-party cooperative governance model.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70