检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆大学西南资源开发及环境灾害控制工程教育部重点实验室,重庆400045 [2]浙江双益环保科技发展有限公司,浙江嘉兴314000
出 处:《重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2012年第2期80-83,共4页Journal of Chongqing Normal University:Natural Science
摘 要:为考察旁路化学除磷对常规A2/O工艺系统脱氮除磷效果的影响,试验在常规A2/O工艺厌氧池末端接入旁路化学除磷池,并调节化学除磷池的pH值以达到除磷的目的。实验结果表明:改进后的A2/O工艺,当进水TN为40~50 mg·L-1、出水TN为11.8~15.5 mg·L-1时,TN平均去除效率为69.21%;当进水TP为4.2~8.9 mg·L-1、出水TP为0.50~0.75 mg·L-1时,TP平均去除效率为90.57%,较传统A2/O工艺,TN、TP去除率分别提高了4.04%、2.37%,说明旁路化学除磷对常规A2/O工艺系统脱氮除磷效果具有一定的改善作用。Abstract: In order to explore the impact of bypass chemical phosphorus removal on the effect of nitrogen and phosphorus removal of conventional A^2/O process, in this experiment, the pool of chemical removal of phosphorus is accessed at the end of anaerobic pool in the A^2/O process and adjust the pH value of pool to achieve phosphorus removal of purpose. Compared with the conventional A^2/O process the result shows that the average removal efficiency of TN is 69. 21% while the TN is 40 -50 mg · L-1 in the intake of water and 11.8- 15.5 mg · L^-1 in the outlet of water, the average removal efficiency of TP is 90. 57% while the TP is 4. 2 ~8.9 mg · L-1 in the intake and 0. 50 - 0. 75 mg · L^-1 in the outlet. The removal efficiency of TN in modified A^2/O process is increased by 4. 04% and the TP is 2. 37%. This indicates that the modified A^2/O process has some improvements on the effect of nitrogen and phosphorus. Key words:A^2/O process; bypass chemical phosphorus removal; removal of nitrogen and phosphorus
分 类 号:X502[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.48