检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]内蒙古医学院附属医院中医科,呼和浩特010050 [2]内蒙古中蒙医医院针灸科,呼和浩特010020
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2012年第3期152-153,共2页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的观察穴位埋线治疗慢性便秘的临床疗效。方法将66例慢性便秘患者随机分为治疗组36例和对照组30例,治疗组采用埋线治疗,对照组采用常规针刺治疗,治疗1~2个疗程后对比疗效。结果治疗组总有效率为94.4%,对照组为90.0%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论穴位埋线和针刺均为治疗慢性便秘的有效方法,穴位埋线更容易被患者接受。Objective To observe the clinical effect of acupoint embedding therapy in treating chronic constipation. Method Sixty-six patients with chronic constipation were randomized into a treatment group (36 cases) and a control group (30 cases). The treatment group received embedding therapy, while the control group received ordinary needling therapy, and the therapeutic effects were compared after 1 ~2 treatment courses between the two groups. Result The total effective rate was 94.4% in the treatment group, versus 90.0% in the control group, and the difference was statistically insignificant (P〉0.05). Conclusion Both point embedding and filiform needling therapies are effective in treating chronic constipation, while the embedding therapy is more acceptable by the patients.
分 类 号:R246.1[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.97