招收飞行学员体格检查标准适宜性评估  

Suitability assessment of physical examination standards for selection of pilot trainees

作　　者：焦志刚[1] 王致洁[1] 曹伟民 郑颖鹃[1] 姜媛媛[1] 张雁歌[1] 陈勇胜[1] 周锡江 

机构地区：[1]北京空军航空医学研究所,100142 [2]空军北京招飞体检队,北京100089

出　　处：《解放军医学杂志》2012年第3期253-256,共4页Medical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army

基　　金：全军“十一五”科技攻关项目(08G044)~~

摘　　要：目的评估招收飞行学员体格检查标准能否满足飞行学员医学选拔的需要。方法分3个步骤实施招收飞行学员体格检查标准的评估。第一步,编制调查手册。根据标准条款适宜性评估涉及的主要因素,编制由适宜性评估及使用情况调查两部分内容组成的调查手册。第二步,筛选专家。采用社会调查学的方法,选择119名专家(其中招飞体检专家98人,航空临床医学专家21人)对359个标准条款进行适宜性评估,并分析评估结果的可靠性。第三步,制定判断标准。根据专家的选择来判断条款的价值。若某一标准条款被超过80%以上的专家评估为适宜,则适宜性高;若低于60%,则适宜性低。结果发放调查手册134份,回收128份,专家参加评估的积极指数为0.95,而权威系数=0.86。在359个条款中,有271条(占75.5%)的适宜性获得专家认可,而有27条(占7.5%)未得到专家的普遍认可,多为不易把握的功能评价条款。结论尽管"招飞标准"大多数条款的适宜性获得专家认可,但仍有少数条款的适宜性不被专家普遍接受,应结合实际使用情况予以重点关注。Objective To investigate and evaluate whether the present physical examination standards for selection of pilot trainees meet the requirements for the medical selection of pilot trainees. Methods The experimental procedure was divided into three steps to evaluate the physical examination standards for the selection of pilot trainees. The first step was to compile a manual of investigation, which was composed of suitability assessments and the result of its use. The second step was to screen for specialists. A social science survey was adopted, and 119 specialists was selected composing 98 specialists in recruitment of pilots and 21 aviation medical clinicians. A total of 359 standard items were subject for suitability approval, and then the reliability of results was evaluated. The final step was the formation of criteria of final judgment. The worthiness of the items was based on the specialists＇ opinions. When a certain item was deemed suitable by more than 80% of the specialists, it was considered as appropriate, and when a certain item was deemed suitable by less than 6096 of the specialists, it was not appropriate. Results A total of 134 survey brochures were sent out, among which 128 were retrieved. The positive index of specialist participation was 0.95, and the authority index was 0.86. 271 （75.5%） of the 359 items were generally accepted by specialists as appropriate, and 27 （7.5%） items were not accepted. Most of these rejected items involved function evaluation, the concept and essence of which could not be easily grasped. Conclusion Mthough the majority of the items in the physical examination standards were deemed appropriate by the specialists, there were a few items not accepted. These standards should be revised after being applied in the future.

关 键 词：飞行人员 体格标准 评估 

分 类 号：R851[医药卫生—航空、航天与航海医学]