干预Ⅰ类切口清洁手术围手术期预防用药的多因素比较  

Class I Clean Surgical Incision Intervention Perioperative Prophylaxis of Multi-factor Comparison

作　　者：苏煌财[1] 林玉仙[1] 张宏[1] 林嘉宏[1] 林青[1] 

机构地区：[1]福州市第一医院临床药学科,福建福州350009

出　　处：《今日药学》2012年第2期116-118,共3页Pharmacy Today

摘　　要：目的找出更有效的干预Ⅰ类切口清洁手术围手术期预防用药的方式方法。方法比较3种干预手段"相关管理规定、相关管理规定+临床药师、相关管理规定+临床药师+行政干预"分别对Ⅰ类切口清洁手术围手术期预防用药的作用,各取3个月比较合理率,采用χ2检验。结果 3种干预手段有显著差异,优越顺序为相关管理规定+临床药师+行政干预、相关管理规定+临床药师、相关管理规定。结论"相关管理规定+临床药师+行政干预"干预方法效果更明显。Objective To identify more effective interventions Class Ⅰ clean surgical incision perioperative prophylaxis ways. Methods The effect of 3 interventions： relevant regulations, relevant regulations ＋ clinical pharmacists and relevant regulations ＋ clinical pharmacists ＋ administrative intervention respectively, on Class Ⅰ clean surgical incision perioperative prophylaxis were compared. The reasonable rate of each intervention in 3 months was compared, using X^2 test. Results The effect of the 3 interventions were significantly different. The effect of relevant regulations ＋ clinical pharmacists ＋ administrative intervention is the best, and the effect of clinical pharmacists ＋ relevant regulations is better than relevant regulations. Conclusion ＂Relevant regulations ＋ clinical pharmacists ＋ administrative intervention ＂ is more effective.

关 键 词：Ⅰ类切口清洁手术 围手术期 预防用药 临床药师 行政干预 

分 类 号：R95[医药卫生—药学]