检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐杰[1] 谢新[1] 王鸣[1] 周庆[1] 张钰[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院,北京100853
出 处:《现代生物医学进展》2012年第3期541-543,共3页Progress in Modern Biomedicine
摘 要:目的:比较超声引导下PICC置管术与传统PICC置管术在老年患者中的应用情况,评价其效果。方法:回顾性分析2009年1月至2010年12月期间解放军总医院南楼老年患者PICC置管情况,记录超声引导及传统PICC置管两种方法的成功率与并发症情况。结果:超声引导组共512例次,传统PICC组共384例次,超声引导组均选择肘上静脉置管,传统PICC置管组均选择肘下静脉;超声引导组一次置管成功率及总成功率分别为96.7%,99.6%,传统PICC组分别为78.6%,86.2(P<0.01);超声引导组相关并发症发生率5.9%,对照组为12.0%(P<0.01)。结论:采用超声引导下PICC穿刺置管术显著提高了置管成功率,降低了PICC相关并发症发生率,与传统PICC组比较优势明显,值得临床推广。Objective: To Compare ultrasound-guided and traditional PICC catheterization in elderly patients and evaluate the application effects.Methods: Retrospectively analyzed the data of PICC catheterization in elderly patients which received ultrasound-guided or traditional PICC catheterization in PLA General hospital from January 2009 to December 2010.Record success and complication rate of two methods.Results: 512 patients underwent ultrasound-guided PICC pacement of Cubits on.384 patients received traditional PICC pacement of Cubits next.The success rate of catheterization in ultrasound-guided group were 96.7%and 99.6% respectively,higher than those in traditional group(P〈0.01);while in ultrasound-guided group,complication rate accounted for 5.9%,lower than that in traditional group 12%(P〈0.01).Conclusion: With the application of ultrasound-Guided technology,success rate of catheterization has been improved and the complication rate has been reduced.It is worth clinical promotion.
关 键 词:外周穿刺中心静脉置管术(PICC) 超声 老年患者 临床应用
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.128.190.174